Outbound Intelligence
Signal-based cold email and LinkedIn outreach targeting companies showing genuine buying intent right now. Qualified meetings on your calendar in 30 days.
For B2B revenue and operations teams who need AI workflows that run in production, not demos in Notion.
Growleads is an AI automation agency that builds AI workflow automation for the GTM work your team copy-pastes every day. Lead enrichment, account scoring, meeting briefs, deal summaries, and follow-up drafts. Built on Clay, Make, n8n, and the model that fits the task. We wire the system. Your reps get their week back.
Highly rated across leading B2B review platforms
1,200+
Qualified meetings delivered
3X
Average pipeline growth
5+
Regions with active clients
8+
Industries served
Trusted by Growing Teams Worldwide
Where AI automations fit
AI Automations is one of three sub-services inside GTM Intelligence. It runs cleanest when paired with Consulting (so the strategy decides what to automate) or GTM Agents (so the agents run the workflows end to end).
Consulting, AI Automations, and GTM Agents running as one revenue operating system. See how the three sub-services compound.
A senior partner walks your data with you, runs interviews with closed-won and closed-lost, and rewrites your go-to-market in 6 weeks.
Account research, reply triage, signal monitoring, and pipeline hygiene, run by agents with their own tools, memory, and approval gates.
How we run an AI automations engagement
Every AI Automations engagement runs this loop. Each workflow ships with docs, monitoring, and a kill switch your team controls.
Week 1: identify the 3 to 5 highest-leverage automation opportunities in your revenue and ops motion. For each, a one-page scope card: what job, what input, what output, what error rate is acceptable, what the fallback is when AI confidence drops. No automation gets built without an approved scope card.
Week 2: benchmark candidate models (GPT-4o, Claude 4, Gemini 2, fine-tuned smaller models) on samples of your real data. Pick the model with the best cost/accuracy tradeoff for each job. The right model for one workflow is wrong for another; we don't standardise to a single one.
Week 3 to 6: build each scoped workflow on Clay, Make.com, n8n, or custom Cloudflare Workers, whichever fits the complexity. Every workflow run logged: input, output, model, cost, confidence. Your team can debug any run from the log alone.
Week 4 to 6: every workflow includes a confidence-check stage. Outputs above threshold deliver to the destination (HubSpot, Salesforce, etc.). Outputs below threshold route to a human reviewer with the AI's reasoning attached. The reviewer's correction feeds back into the prompt/few-shot examples to lift confidence over time.
Week 6 to 8: production launch. We monitor cost, accuracy, and uptime daily for the first 30 days. Adjust thresholds, model choice, or orchestration as live data reveals real-world friction. 60-day post-launch advisory included; your team takes over operation by day 60.
The infrastructure underneath
No vendor lock-in. Built on observable tooling your team can debug, monitor, and run without us.
Every workflow starts with a one-page scope card: what job is being automated, what input data, what output format, what's the acceptable error rate, what's the fallback when AI confidence is low. No ambiguity, no demo-grade prompts.
Right model for the job, not the trendy one. GPT-4o for general reasoning, Claude for long-context structured outputs, Gemini for multimodal, fine-tuned smaller models where cost matters. We benchmark on your real data before locking in.
Clay for data enrichment, Make.com or n8n for multi-step workflows, custom code via Cloudflare Workers where complexity exceeds no-code. All observable. Every workflow run logged with input, output, model, cost.
Every workflow runs a confidence check on its own output before delivery. Low-confidence outputs route back to a human reviewer with the AI's reasoning attached. Builds trust in the workflow over time.
Outputs land in HubSpot, Salesforce, your data warehouse, or wherever your team already works. No 'check the agency dashboard' tax. AI automation should disappear into your existing operating system.
Case studies
Named clients, named industries, and the actual forecast accuracy, hours saved, and CRM hygiene gains from our consulting and automation work. No anonymised case studies.
View all case studiesAauti · India and US
Aauti needed a repeatable instructor-onboarding motion. We ran coordinated email and LinkedIn cadences against the same ICP, with sender splits protecting deliverability and a manual qualification pass before any meeting hit the calendar.
Jindal Lifestyle · US, Europe, Mexico
Jindal Lifestyle wanted to open an OEM vertical separate from its retail business. We ran 8 campaigns across three geographies and three named trade shows (Ambiente, NRAS, NAEFM), with industry-specific positioning per region and LinkedIn outbound running in parallel.
UK student housing brand · enterprise client (anonymised)
An enterprise UK student-housing brand watched rising CPCs erode its primary acquisition channel. We rebuilt the Google Ads programme around tight match-type discipline on high-intent housing queries, a landing-page refresh that matched ad copy to the application form, and weekly bid review against actual booking data.
ImpactCraftAI · India, US, UAE
ImpactCraftAI launched with no installed base, no inbound leads, and no warm network. We ran 17 campaigns across India, US, UAE, Massachusetts, and California with per-geography copy splits. The California campaign alone hit a 12.1% reply rate on 2,925 sent.
Fox India Voyages · India
Fox India Voyages sells MICE and corporate event logistics. The buyer pool is narrow but high-intent. We ran a LinkedIn-led outbound system that opened every message with the planner's calendar problem, not Fox's service catalogue.
STITCH · Apparel manufacturing
STITCH sells a garment MES to apparel factories. Most agency programmes were burning the budget on broad-match irrelevant traffic. We rebuilt around tight exact-match keywords on "garment MES" and "production tracking software", and rewrote the landing page with manufacturer-specific proof blocks and a three-field form.
FullDome.pro · Global
FullDome.pro sells immersive dome installations to museums, planetariums, theme parks, and immersive venues. The challenge was precision, not scale. We ran a tight email and LinkedIn programme against a manually curated decision-maker list, with sub-vertical copy splits per venue type.
ZappLoans · India
ZappLoans needed digital loan application volume at unit economics that worked. We ran salaried-professional targeting on instant-loan keywords, with continuous spend optimisation week-on-week against actual borrower disbursement data.
Bana · Global
Bana sells designer and fashion-brand fabric sourcing. We ran high-intent keyword precision against the searches designers and merchandisers actually use, with proof-led creatives that spoke to fabric quality and consistency, not to generic supplier positioning.
Video testimonials
Why Growleads
We are accountable for one thing: qualified meetings with decision-makers who have real budget and authority. Not open rates. Not sequences sent. Not monthly reports that show everything except pipeline.
GEO and AEO, getting your brand cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, is live for Growleads clients today. Most demand generation agencies are still running the 2021 playbook. The first-mover window is roughly 18 months wide.
Outbound, inbound, and LinkedIn authority all draw from the same buyer model. Your buyer experiences a consistent, credible brand across every channel. Your pipeline compounds instead of plateauing. One partner, one weekly call.
ICP models, signal libraries, channel playbooks, messaging frameworks, AI automation infrastructure. All of it is yours. The system compounds. Campaigns stop the moment the retainer does. The intelligence we build does not.
If outbound is not right for your market, we say so in the first call. If your ICP is too broad to run with precision, we push back before a dollar is spent. This has cost us some projects. It has kept clients for years.
Testimonials
A 30-day system, not a guess. We understand your buyer first, then build, activate, and run every channel under one intelligence layer.
We study your buyer before touching a single tool: intent signals, channel behaviour, buying committee, decision timeline. The channel decision comes after the buyer is understood, never before.
A channel plan built for your ICP and your market, not a template with your logo on it. It names the channels, the rationale, the budget, and the expected outcomes. You approve it first.
Campaigns go live in 14 days. The intelligence is already built, so activation is fast without cutting corners. The first message knows who it is going to and why they respond.
Outbound, inbound, and LinkedIn authority running under one strategy and one intelligence layer. You attend the meetings. We run everything else.
Shared dashboards and weekly insights: meetings booked, pipeline created, conversion at each stage. Not emails opened. The numbers that connect to revenue.
What's the difference between this and just hiring someone to set up Zapier?
Zapier setup ships a workflow. AI automation engineering ships a workflow that works reliably on real-world data with measurable error rates, observable logs, confidence routing, and a defined fallback when the AI gets it wrong. The first one is task automation. The second one is production AI engineering. Different work, different reliability.
Which AI models do you actually use?
Whichever fits the job. GPT-4o for general reasoning and tool use. Claude (Anthropic) for long-context structured outputs. Gemini for multimodal (images, video). Fine-tuned smaller models (or open-source like Llama / Mistral) where cost and latency dominate. We benchmark on your real data; we do not pick the trendy model.
How do you handle hallucinations?
Three layers. (1) Every workflow has a confidence check on its own output before delivery. (2) Low-confidence outputs route to a human reviewer with the AI's reasoning attached. (3) Critical workflows (anything involving billing, contracts, customer commitments) get human-in-the-loop confirmation on every run. We design for the workflow tolerating mistakes; if a workflow cannot tolerate any error rate, we don't build it.
What's the cost of running these in production?
Depends on volume and model. Typical revenue/ops workflow: $50 to $500/month in model API costs at moderate volume. Heavy-volume workflows (50,000+ runs/month): $1K to $5K/month. We track cost per workflow run from day 1; if the cost climbs, we surface it before it becomes a budget surprise.
Do you build on our existing tools or push us to proprietary platforms?
Your existing tools. Workflows ship on Clay, Make.com, n8n, Cloudflare Workers, your data warehouse, your CRM. We do not build on proprietary 'Growleads platforms' you have to keep paying for. The point of AI automation is that your team can run it; that only works on tools your team uses.
How do you handle changes when the AI model gets updated by OpenAI / Anthropic?
Every workflow is versioned. When a model is updated, we run the previous workflow against the new model on a sample of recent runs and check accuracy. If accuracy drops, we adjust prompts/few-shot examples. If accuracy holds or improves, we promote the new model. The team doesn't see the change.
Will you train our team to maintain these workflows?
Yes. 60-day post-launch period includes operator training: weekly sessions on how to read the workflow logs, how to adjust confidence thresholds, how to debug a failed run. The goal is that day 60 onwards your team owns the work, with us on call for genuinely hard issues.
Who owns the workflows, prompts, and model configurations at handover?
You do. All workflows, prompts, scope cards, model configurations, observability dashboards, and API keys are in your accounts from day 1. We give a 14-day handover with a recorded walkthrough of every production workflow. Nothing is locked behind a Growleads-owned account.
What does an AI automations engagement cost?
We do not publish a number because every engagement is sized to the number of workflows, complexity per workflow, and model API budget. What we will say upfront: 8 to 12 week fixed-scope build engagement with 60-day post-launch advisory, priced per workflow shipped to production, not hourly. The first call gives you a number tailored to your scope.
How is this different from a marketing automation agency?
A marketing automation agency wires email flows and nurture tracks. We build AI workflow automation across the whole GTM motion: lead enrichment, account scoring, meeting briefs, deal summaries, and follow-up drafts, on Clay, Make, n8n, and the model that fits the task.
Is this business process automation?
It overlaps, but we are narrower on purpose. Business process automation cleans up generic ops; we point AI workflow automation at the GTM work, lead enrichment, scoring, meeting briefs, and follow-ups, that directly feeds pipeline.
Resources
Playbooks and breakdowns from the demand programmes we run. Written by the operators doing the work, not a content team.
Lead quality vs quantity is the wrong debate. Learn how B2B teams can measure qualified pipeline, sales opportunities, ROI, and revenue impact in 2026.
Most lead generation campaigns fail before launch. Learn how ICP, GTM strategy, messaging, data, qualification and campaign planning prevent wasted spend.
Learn what a transparent lead generation process includes, from ICP research and outreach to qualification, reporting, sales handoff, and pipeline review.
You build the business. We build the demand.
We will audit your highest-leverage automation opportunities, tell you which ones are AI-ready and which are not, and give a realistic estimate of cost per workflow and time to production. No commitment. No pitch deck. If your workflows cannot tolerate any AI error rate, we will say so before the contract.
Avg. response in 4 hours · Calendly · No sales pressure